technical value assessed with reference to the technical memory framework, with the following sub-criteria - quality of the team that will be responsible for the assignment (underweighting
20%) - consistency of the decomposition of the time spent and coherence of the resources put in provision for the implementation of the program by mission element (underweight 20%) - relevance and coherence of the optimized performance execution schedule, as proposed by the candidate (underweight 10%) - quality of the candidate~s proposals in favor of sustainable development (underweight 10%) 60% -
the quality of the team dedicated to the service evaluated on the basis of point a of the cmt (underweighting
35%) 2.Quality of the methodology for achieving the mission assessed on the basis of the point b of the cmt (underweight 45%) 3.Quality of the experiences of the persons dedicated to the performance of services and references of the team for similar or comparable services assessed on the basis of point c the cmt (underweight 10%) 4.Quality of the measures taken in terms of graphic and technical rendering for all the documents requested from the ccp assessed on the basis of point d of the cmt (underweighting
10%) 70% -
the technical sheets to be provided are indicated by a * in the dpgf.Sust criterion 2.2 (underweighting
15%) quality of the methodology of execution of the services appreciated under point a of the framework of technical memory and in coherence with the schedule detailed by task under 2.3 (underweight 10%) quality of the material resources dedicated to the performance of the services evaluated in relation to point b of the technical memory framework.