Based on the deal, in exchange for the shares of GQM Holdings, the Purchasers
paid the Company USD4.25m in cash, released the firm of all debt owing to the Purchasers
and returned for cancellation all options and warrants held by the Purchasers
On appeal, Deutsche Bank argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Purchasers
because: (1) its mortgage was a prior, superior interest of record; (2) the stipulation did not discharge the mortgage; (3) WIS.
, current dollars (1) 2.2 5.6 4.3 4.4
STRONG PARTICIPANT CREDIT QUALITY: The rating reflects the credit quality of IPA's six California purchasers
, who are contracted by the PSCs to purchase 79% of project generation but purchase nearly 100% of power output through excess power sales contracts with the Utah purchasers
should develop a cyber due diligence strategy to ensure that the target meets or exceeds the purchaser
's standards and to ensure the appropriate price is paid for the target.
In the correspondence we receive from Ebrahim Abdulaal's sidekick Y P Madan, which is sporadic and very, very misleading, so much so that it is darn-right-lies, he appears to take glory in referring to us the purchasers
as partners and investors.
(27) The Court, however, ruled in the defendant's favor, holding that "direct purchasers
[are] injured to the full extent of the overcharge paid by them." (28) This is so even if the direct purchaser
passed the entire overcharge on to subsequent customers.
The restructuring proposal, which Cirrus has developed and is now presenting to its purchasers
in Aquarius Gate, works on the basis of converting the status of purchasers
of units in Aquarius Gate to that of shareholders in a 'new project company' which will develop the project.
Soon after the Court's decision, states began to enact laws "repealing" Illinois Brick by authorizing indirect purchasers
to sue for damages in state courts; other states' courts interpreted their existing antitrust or consumer protection laws to allow indirect purchaser
The vendors had not disclosed the presence of radioactive contamination in the area to the purchasers
, nor did they advise the purchasers
of the finding of contamination on their property.
It unsuccessfully argued that the residence was first sold to the employer, then sold by the employer to the third-party purchaser
. It further contended that the employer's payments to the RSC were for capital assets (purchase of the residence) and, thus, not deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses.