The cephalometric
mean values reported are specific to an ethnic group that should be applied on the same groups as one normal measurement may look attractive in one population but may not look attractive in another.6-12 Therefore each population should be treated according to specific characteristics of its own.6 Literature reported varying results in determination of lip position in different racial groups when comparing with norms based on Caucasian samples of European-American ancestry.6-7 There is significant difference among different ethnic groups when these cephalometric measurements are taken into consideration in orthodontics diagnosing and planning.6-7,13.
A statistically significant difference in the
mean values of the BCVA in both eyes was established between the groups; values were significantly lower in the PDR group, which is in accordance with the study from India, where the BCVA was proportionally reduced with the severity of diabetic retinopathy [14].
To compare the
mean values among all study groups, Post-hoc LSD test was conducted.
For the non-malignant group
mean value of SAAG (g/dl) is 1.81 [+ or -] 0.70 vs 0.87 [+ or -] 0.34 in malignant group.
Due to the absence of properties such as TS2h and water absorption after 2h (WA2h) and 24 h (WA24h) of water immersion in normative codes, the
mean values resulting from this study were compared to the literature.
In semiarid regions, as shown in Figure 6, Coniferous Forest's PUE is the highest, with an average of the multiyear
mean value of 9.73 x [10.sup.-1] gC x [m.sup.-2] x [mm.sup.-1]; this is significantly higher than the national average, especially in a small number of regions in the southern Tibetan valley and in northern Xinjiang.
Mean value of serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) in affected animals before treatment was significantly higher (p[less than or equal to]0.05) than
mean value of healthy animals and post-treatment value of affected animals.
Feature values in high CIN cases were higher and more spread, as shown in the box plots of Figures 3(d)-3(g) and in the
mean values and standard deviations of Table 3.
Actual
mean values and variances for the speeds of 20, 40 and 70 mm/min 20 40
mean value variance
mean value variance Mean 40.19373977 9.56918E-09 40.19323585 1.14424E-08 Flatness 0.010920845 3.87182E-09 0.010969845 1.0583E-09 Concentricity 0.008227182 3.26466E-07 0.008505027 1.92269E-07 Straightness 0.009515355 2.09533E-09 0.009514591 2.04718E-09 70
mean value variance Mean 40.1935387 2.59506E-09 Flatness 0.010920473 6.62968E-09 Concentricity 0.008505027 1.92269E-07 Straightness 0.009514591 2.04718E-09 Table 6.
The above table documented
mean values of different dimensions of gratification individually.
The
mean values of e-GFR estimated by different equations were compared in various study groups according to degree of albuminuria by the ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests.
Maximum
mean value for spike weight was perceived by FD-83 having
mean values 4.0840.
