marriage benefit

marriage benefit

The concept that married persons enjoy a de facto tax benefit not given to other couples because the married filing jointly tax rates are lower than the ones for single persons.

References in periodicals archive ?
This suggests that the overall magnitude of the marriage penalty is larger than that of the marriage benefit in these upper-income returns for married individuals filing jointly.
If marriage is so natural, why the need for its constant defense, the elaborate ceremonies, the marriage benefit, the tax credits for children?
Curiously, the marriage benefit seen in the new study was nearly identical for both men and women.
The current laws on marriage benefit only man-woman relationships, basically disregarding any nontraditional adult love relationships
Her question "How could we respond to the betrayal of democracy and the collapse of dissent?" makes me wonder why our gay leaders have not responded forcefully to the notion of the repeal of the "marriage penalty tax." In reality it's a "marriage benefit tax" that should remain to pay for the thousand benefits and privileges gained with marriage.
In the meantime, advocates have their eyes on a Harris County district court, where the Houston same-sex marriage benefits case is set for trial in January.
In the interim, Baehr led both to domestic partnerships in Hawaii and to the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which prohibited same-sex couples from gaining any federal marriage benefits. Most activists believed that the Baehr case was brought "too early" by appellants who did not have a formal position in the LGBTQ movement.
In September 2016, the all Republican Texas Supreme Court passed on review of a case involving gay marriage benefits to City of Houston employees.
On the upside, remarriage offers protective benefits against subsequent AUD, researchers found, due to many marriage benefits, including spousal monitoring and moderating one another's health-related behaviors.
Windsor, (34) invalidating the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which had denied federal marriage benefits to homosexual couples married in states that authorized same-sex marriage, set the stage for the Obergefell decision, a decision anticipated by a number of lower federal courts, and also state courts, after Windsor.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said heterosexual couples would retain the same marriage benefits they currently have, whether or not same-sex couples also could marry.
The repeal of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act paved the way to open marriage benefits for gay couples, but if they live in states that don't recognize same-sex marriage--of which there are still 15--they may still require the kind of complex financial planning they required before the repeal.
Full browser ?