'With careful planning and adherence to sound mining practices and design, combined with prudent implementation of all recommended mitigating and control measures, the proposed project will be able to reduce the predicted adverse impacts to a low level of significance
Table 3 presents that t-value (3.71) is not significant (p = .39) at 0.05 level of significance
. Therefore it is shown that there is no significant difference in the students with and without visual impairment regarding task accomplishment.
The scores of 20 or less age group and 21-25 age group had significant difference with all three factors (IR, LEST and AR) of EE at pa$?0.05 level of significance
. Hence, it is revealed that 20 or less and 21-25 years students who are newly enrolled at University of the Punjab had statistically no significant mean difference with IR, LEST and AR towards getting admission.
The result shows that all the variable are found significance in which the proxies used for HK are EE and LSEV are found significant at 1% level of significance
and HE, LSE and LSEG found significant at 5% level of significance
and reject the null hypothesis.
financial revenue/average total assets (FR/ATA) ratio, yield on gross loan portfolio (nominal) ratio and yield on gross loan portfolio (real) ratio is higher than South Asian benchmark and the difference is significant at 1% level of significance
. This shows that Pakistani MFBs are earning more revenues as compared to the South Asian MFBs, but these revenues are consumed by the huge expenses thus higher revenues could not be translated into profitability.
In the estimates of fixed effect model, imports and population are statistically significant at 5% level of significance
, while economic institutions are insignificant statistically.
Since p value is less than the level of significance
(p < .05), we can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis, that is the interventions given in Group B (Mulligan mobilisation and UST) were significantly better than Group A (Maitland mobilisation and UST) in improving abduction ROM.
It is possible to conclude on the basis of calculation results in Table 3 that by the adopted level of significance
[alpha]=0,05, only the differences between mean values of GRTA and DR indicators are not statistically significant.
The level of significance
was found to be 3.5 sigma.
The result shows that there is no significant association between the extent on the causes of dropouts of ALS beneficiaries in Liloy and Tampilisan districts with the r - value of 0.578 and P = value of 0.136 at [alpha] 0.05 level of significance
It was found that treatment T6 having combination of two semiochemicals exhibited the higher level of significance
. Similarly treatment T2 which consisted of only one semiochemical, also exhibited higher level of significance
125 7.921 Variable p ran 30 meters to stand 0.000 Gambol stability 0.000 Three a partridge right 0.000 Three a partridge left 0.000 (*) Upon the degree of freedom (9) the level of significance
is less than or equal to (0.05).