The
appellant claimed that the departmental promotion committee had unlawfully and by being influenced by the working paper appointed Nasrullah as additional secretary on Aug 18, 2007.
The
appellant also informed the Court of Appeal that Justice Tsoho was wrong to have held that a consent judgment is not a judgment on the merits and could be set aside through a motion on notice adding that a consent judgment is recognized under section 241(2)(c) of the of the constitution as a final judgment against which an appeal could only be lodged with leave.
In the meanwhile, various writ petitions against the
appellants were under adjudication before the Lahore High Court Lahore.
47 of 2009
appellant preferred Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.
3 of such Article would start from the point of time, when the proof of the death of insured has been given to or received by the insurer, and when the merits of present case are adjudged on the touchstone of such provision of law, it would abundantly clear that, when on 17-6-2004, through claim, when the fact of death of the insured was, for the first time, placed before the Insurance Corporation, it was the point of time from-where the period of limitation was to be started for the
appellant for filing an application under section 118 of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000 before the Tribunal.
The
appellant also argued that the Arbitration Rules were unconstitutional because they had not been issued by the Bahraini parliament as the competent legislative authority, but were instead ratified by the King as head of the executive authority.
The full record of the Ministers decisions are appended hereto reflecting the Ministers decisions on appeals by existing right holder
appellants in traditional line fishing Zones A, B and C and the Ministers decisions on appeals by new entrant
appellants.
Appellant subsequently sued Allstate seeking a declaration that Allstate had a contractual duty to indemnify and defend him in the Licking County action, pursuant to a policy of insurance.
The result has been that the
appellant files an appeal with the superior court, and at the same time files an appeal with the ZBA.
At about the same time the brother claimed the
appellant had threatened to kill him and his son - which was denied.
The Second Circuit further ordered the
appellant and her attorney to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for their conduct on appeal.
The facts of the case are fairly complex, being concerned with the numerous dealings between the
appellant and the respondent over a number of years, as well as a number of ancillary events and issues.
