The second, relating to events preceding the actual use of deadly force, alleges
that policy and procedural violations leading up to the officer's use of deadly force caused the situation that ultimately justified the officer's use of deadly force.
From there, various associates picked up the packages and sent them to Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota and other Midwest locations, court documents allege
The lawsuit alleges
that iPayment's accountants were actively involved in the evaluation of their shares prior to a public offering in March 2003, and perpetrated an arbitrary and fraudulent evaluation to aid its client, iPayment, in the scheme to defraud.
Securities Fraud Lawsuit Brought At Request of Shareholders/Stock Drops as Indictments Handed Down--Complaint Alleges
Defendants Failed to Warn Public of Ongoing Official Criminal Probe and Other Material Facts
that she was injured when she slipped and fell in an aisle at a store at 60 Division Ave.
In the lawsuit, Robison also alleges
that Henry was a paid member of West Hollywood's Human Services Commission, which recommends funding for HIV-related programs.
that the Florida law conflicts with federal law and violates the supremacy clause of the U.
The complaint further alleges
that when LRP introduced its own federal employment research guide, cyberFEDS[R] (www.
Even if a plaintiff clears the first hurdle and alleges
an injury of constitutional significance, courts must determine whether the violation was clearly established at the time the action occurred.
The suit alleges
that Goodman's clean audit opinion is false and the lawsuit further alleges
that Goodman's audit opinion was the centerpiece of a carefully calculated campaign to deprive Costa Brava, and other holders of Telos's public redeemable securities, of millions of dollars.
The Complaint further alleges
that, Defendants, realizing that institutional investors who normally buy in IPOs would be reluctant at best to purchase Vonage shares as-priced, pre-sold at least 13.
But DIC alleges
that SRE, ``at its first opportunity,'' tried to back out of the deal to ``either extort a higher payment from DIC than first agreed upon or shop the newly elevated property to third parties,'' the suit states.