The second, relating to events preceding the actual use of deadly force,
alleges that policy and procedural violations leading up to the officer's use of deadly force caused the situation that ultimately justified the officer's use of deadly force.
Merle Stensgaard: Plaintiff
alleges breach of contract.
Kari Lee Powell aka Kari Karsten and Rodney Powell: Plaintiff
alleges breach of contract.
Hillsboro Forest Products, Inc.: Plaintiff
alleges breach of contract.
Edgmon; Katherine Green; State of Oregon; David Hopkins; occupants of 87864 Upland St., Springfield: Plaintiff
alleges breach of contract.
The complaint
alleges that "for years" Marsh collected special payments from insurers "that were above and beyond normal sales commissions." Spitzer alleged that such "contingent commissions" were characterized as compensation for market services--but were actually "rewards for the business that Marsh and its independent brokers steered and allocated to the insurance companies."
18090 (www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases), the SEC states: "The complaint
alleges that beginning May 14, 2002, Agora, Pirate and Stansberry disseminated unsolicited e-mails to subscribers of more than 15 internet newsletters published by Agora.
PhrMA
alleges that the Florida law conflicts with federal law and violates the supremacy clause of the U.S.
In addition, the complaint
alleges that the defendants have taken actions to keep the plaintiffs off bidding lists, had the plaintiffs' telecommunications installation jobs reassigned to electrical contractors, and interfered with the plaintiffs' work, equipment and personnel.
unknown heirs of Duane Violette and Jacquelyn Violette; Jodi Trujillo; Tanya Trujillo; John Trujillo; occupants of 38308 Lower Brice Creek Road, Culp Creek: Plaintiff
alleges breach of contract.
The complaint further
alleges that when LRP introduced its own federal employment research guide, cyberFEDS[R] (www.feds.com), IHS responded in anti-competitive fashion to preserve its monopoly.
The typical vanishing-premium lawsuit
alleges that a defendant-insurer sold so-called vanishing-premium life insurance.