In
bankruptcy, the ability of a court to formulate and implement a
Chapter 11 reorganization plan over and above the objections of
creditors. Generally speaking,
unsecured creditors object to a
debtor's bankruptcy because they have no recourse for retrieving the
debt. The rationale behind a cramdown is the fact that unsecured creditors will usually receive part of the debt back under a Chapter 11 reorganization, but would receive nothing in a
Chapter 7 liquidation. Cramdown is therefore thought to be the least negative option for both the debtor and the creditors. Courts are required, however, to formulate a cramdown that is as equitable as possible for all parties.