Right to Privacy

(redirected from Warren Court)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Wikipedia.
Related to Warren Court: Rehnquist Court

Right to Privacy

The right not to be violated without one's consent. For example, the right to privacy includes the right to be secure in one's own person or home. The right to privacy in guaranteed in many jurisdictions. Other jurisdictions that do not explicitly provide a right to privacy may provide some protections. For example, a government may prohibit searches in a private area without a warrant.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
Indeed, because legal conservatism has shifted so radically toward the left, classic works like Bozell's 1966 book on the Warren Court and Bork's Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline (1996) now read more like reactionary literature than anything resembling contemporary legal conservatism.
The decision's expansive view of an individual's confession rights would not last much longer than the Warren Court itself.
73) By the time of Griswold four years later, the Warren Court was well on its way toward developing the latitudinarian justiciability doctrines with which that Court is typically associated.
Attorneys have only so many hours and resources available to defend their clients; meanwhile, the new Warren Court due process rights, Stuntz claims, are mostly unrelated to the question of guilt versus innocence (pp.
is the Warren Court, responsible for Brown, Loving, and Katz, three
The Warren Court established some of the most basic and fundamental principles of criminal procedure and the requirements incumbent on law enforcement regarding treatment of suspects.
Connecticut, the 1965 Warren Court decision often thought to have found a general constitutional right to privacy, Bork attempted to show that it is equally important to define principles with sufficient precision that they become capable of neutral application.
I examine the use of originalist sources during the Warren Court.
We'd do well to find judges who will focus on the third type of Warren Court case and say that gross and open violations of the Constitution have to stop.
The Warren court proclaimed that students' free-speech rights did not end at the "schoolhouse gate" and that public employees should be protected when they speak out on a matter of public interest.
Warren tapped Brennan to write the majority opinion in scores of the most contentious and iconic decisions of the Warren Court, including Baker v.
Craig Elliott, 40, of Warren Court, Southport, admitted assault when he appeared at North Sefton Magistrates' Cours t.