Supreme Court eliminated "manifest disregard of the law" as a basis for vacating an arbitral award as not a violation of public policy
in Hall St.
Guarino cannot assert a claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy
because he was employed for a term of years, not at-will; in any case, firing Guarino in part for publicly criticizing IHP did not violate public policy.
Employer does not assign error to the commission's finding, but contends that the fine imposed was "burdensome, excessive and in violation of public policy
." We review this matter for an abuse of discretion.
Baker alleged that he had been a highly productive employee, and that the record contained "substantial evidence [that] management and human resources were 'irritated and even hostile' regarding the requests for information and past due wages," and so a reasonable jury could conclude he was terminated in retaliation for his inquiries about the bonuses, and in violation of public policy
In his appeal Matuzalem had argued that the CAS award was de facto leading to a prohibition of working as a football player worldwide and forever and therefore amounted to a violation of public policy
At that point, the trial court granted Liberty's motion for summary judgment as to the counts alleging defamation and termination in violation of public policy
. The trial court thereafter granted Liberty's motion to enforce an arbitration clause in Karen's employment agreement and dismissed her remaining claims against Liberty.
Passing over a string of more qualified candidates wasn't necessarily a codified violation of public policy
, just as it wouldn't be in the private sector.
CI ruled that an employer cannot discharge someone in violation of public policy
Thus, an employee cannot be fired just because he or she has refused to commit an illegal act, performed a public obligation (such as jury duty), reported criminal misconduct, or engaged in an activity encouraged or protected by Utah public policy, such as filing for workers' compensation benefits when injured on the job.
After he was terminated by the hospital, he drafted a civil complaint alleging claims for tortious discharge in violation of public policy
and other "representative" claims on behalf of the general public.
On April 4, 2008, the doctor filed a complaint against the hospital alleging breach of contract, tortious breach of contract, violation of public policy
, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with advantageous business relationship or expectancy, and defamation.
162(f) and 165 and the violation of public policy
doctrine raised in recent cases.
The new lawsuit, filed by Robert Nau of Los Angeles firm Alexander Nau Lawrence Frumes & Labowitz, claims damages of at least $5 million on causes of action for breach of contract, accounting and wrongful termination in violation of public policy