Risk Neutral


Also found in: Wikipedia.

Risk Neutral

A situation in which an investor effectively ignores risk in making investment decisions. Given two investments with different levels of riskiness, a risk neutral investor considers only the expected return from each investment. As such, being risk neutral differs significantly from both risk aversion and risk seeking.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
Formula (12) clearly shows that hedging must be thoroughly performed because the parameters in the optimal ratio pertain to different universes: namely, historical versus risk neutral.
It describes the basic math required for derivative pricing and financial engineering, including stochastic differential equation models; Ito's lemma for Brownian motion and Poisson process driven stochastic differential equations; stochastic differential equations that have closed form solutions; the factor model approach to arbitrage pricing; constructing a factor model pricing framework; its application to equity derivatives and interest rate and credit derivatives; approaches to hedging; computational methods used in derivative pricing from the factor model perspective; and the concept of risk neutral pricing.
Workers are risk averse, so they need insurance, but firms are risk neutral.
One of the main element of contemporary financial theory is the risk neutral pricing.
A risk neutral investor will judge a risky prospect solely by its expected return, regardless of the level of risk.
First, we consider a risk neutral landowner who compares the discounted value of expected profits from energy crop production to that from corn/soybeans and does not consider variations in crop profits.
Section 4 derives the optimal risk manager compensation contracts when effort is not observable but managers are risk neutral.
In a risk neutral framework, the value at each node is calculated as the discounted expectation of the two possible values of the option.
When spreads are low and do not offer an adequate "margin of safety" relative to our fundamental outlook, we lower our allocation to the spread sectors of the market, increase our allocation to risk neutral sectors, including treasuries, and evaluate for a more attractive entry point.
Assume player 1 has a CRRA utility function and is risk averse, u(x), u'> 0, u" < 0 and player 2 is risk neutral, v(x) = x.
We find that the equilibrium of the game is different from those of the classical model conducted under the assumption that both the manufacturer and the retailer are risk neutral.
Figure 2 also shows that there are two modes when individuals bid on their own behalf: One is risk averse (r > 0), and the other is approximately risk neutral (r [approximatley equal to] 0).