burden of proof

(redirected from Preponderance of the evidence)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Encyclopedia.
Related to Preponderance of the evidence: Clear and convincing evidence, proof beyond a reasonable doubt

Burden of Proof

The obligations one party must meet to prove a fact in court. The party holding the burden of proof in a case must back each of his/her assertions with evidence for them to be legally acceptable. In a criminal case, the burden of proof rests with the prosecutor; in a civil case, it resides with the plaintiff. See also: Beyond a reasonable doubt, Preponderance of evidence.
Farlex Financial Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc. All Rights Reserved

burden of proof

In court, the responsibility to come forward with credible evidence that a thing happened or did not happen.Normally,the party who complains about a wrongdoing has the burden of proof. In some circumstances, primarily under federal laws related to discrimination, the aggrieved party need only make an allegation of wrongful behavior and the defendant has the burden of proof that his or her behavior was reasonable under the circumstances.The burden of proof may be set at different levels for various types of litigation. For example:

• When contesting a property tax valuation, the owner must generally prove that the assessment was manifestly excessive, clearly erroneous, or confiscatory. This burden of proof is very high, much more than required to show the assessment was simply inaccurate.

• Housing discrimination cases involve a three-step process that moves the burden of proof back and forth. Under what is called the McDonnell Douglas test, plaintiffs have the burden of showing they are a member of a protected minority; they applied for and were qualified to rent or purchase property; and they were rejected and the housing or rental opportunity remained available afterward. That creates a presumption of discrimination, which shifts the burden to the defendants to prove they had legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for their actions. If successful, the burden shifts back to the plaintiffs to prove by a preponderance of the evidence (meaning, “more likely than not”) that the offered reason was a pretext and there really was a discriminatory purpose.

The Complete Real Estate Encyclopedia by Denise L. Evans, JD & O. William Evans, JD. Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
References in periodicals archive ?
While OCR is investigating 94 schools for Title IX violations, (100) OCR is investigating the schools because they may not be complying with Title IX's requirements to apply a "preponderance of the evidence" standard, to prove prompt and equitable responses to complaints of sexual harassment and sexual assault, or to end a sexually hostile environment for the student who filed a report.
Hibbard could not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she suffered from autonomic neuropathy, and, therefore, autonomic neuropathy could not be the cause of the dysautonomia.
evidence (highest burden) and preponderance of the evidence (lowest
'has the burden to prove the requisite amount by a preponderance of the evidence'" regardless of whether the complaint pleads a specific amount in controversy.
Even if the presumption of patent validity merits using a higher evidentiary standard than a preponderance of the evidence, the clear and convincing standard should not apply to patents where the prior art was not before the PTO.
The Court therefore holds that, "in order to merit habeas relief in a proceeding seeking collateral review of an extradition order, the petitioner must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is 'in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States,' 28 U.S.C.
section 25-4-45.5, to the evidentiary standard of a preponderance of the evidence. (187) Further, the court explained that the function of a presumption is not to shift the burden of proof to the adverse party, but rather, it "imposes on the party against whom it is directed the burden of going forward with evidence to rebut or meet the presumption." (188) Finally, the court asserted that "substantial, credible evidence" is necessary to rebut the presumption against awarding custody to perpetrators of domestic violence.
Moreover, in adopting this elevated burden of proof, the court ignored the settled principle that the default burden of proof in civil actions should be the preponderance of the evidence standard.
The majority of federal circuit courts hold that in either of these two situations, the removing defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the federal amount in controversy requirement is satisfied.
(755 ILCS 5/11-14.1) The parents must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that, since the appointment of the guardian, the circumstances of the minor or parent have materially changed.
Instead, the Court held that the plaintiff must prove by a "preponderance of the evidence" that age was the "but-for" cause of the defendant's action.
(That's the rule in criminal cases.) Rather, he must prove liability by a preponderance of the evidence. That is akin to the scales being tipped slightly in the patient's favor.