burden of proof

(redirected from Preponderance of evidence)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Encyclopedia.
Related to Preponderance of evidence: burden of proof, Clear and convincing evidence

Burden of Proof

The obligations one party must meet to prove a fact in court. The party holding the burden of proof in a case must back each of his/her assertions with evidence for them to be legally acceptable. In a criminal case, the burden of proof rests with the prosecutor; in a civil case, it resides with the plaintiff. See also: Beyond a reasonable doubt, Preponderance of evidence.
Farlex Financial Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc. All Rights Reserved

burden of proof

In court, the responsibility to come forward with credible evidence that a thing happened or did not happen.Normally,the party who complains about a wrongdoing has the burden of proof. In some circumstances, primarily under federal laws related to discrimination, the aggrieved party need only make an allegation of wrongful behavior and the defendant has the burden of proof that his or her behavior was reasonable under the circumstances.The burden of proof may be set at different levels for various types of litigation. For example:

• When contesting a property tax valuation, the owner must generally prove that the assessment was manifestly excessive, clearly erroneous, or confiscatory. This burden of proof is very high, much more than required to show the assessment was simply inaccurate.

• Housing discrimination cases involve a three-step process that moves the burden of proof back and forth. Under what is called the McDonnell Douglas test, plaintiffs have the burden of showing they are a member of a protected minority; they applied for and were qualified to rent or purchase property; and they were rejected and the housing or rental opportunity remained available afterward. That creates a presumption of discrimination, which shifts the burden to the defendants to prove they had legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for their actions. If successful, the burden shifts back to the plaintiffs to prove by a preponderance of the evidence (meaning, “more likely than not”) that the offered reason was a pretext and there really was a discriminatory purpose.

The Complete Real Estate Encyclopedia by Denise L. Evans, JD & O. William Evans, JD. Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
References in periodicals archive ?
Under pressure, that university changed its standard in sexual misconduct cases from clear and convincing to preponderance of evidence.
Rittenhouse believes that putting the employee and the employer on equal footing under the statute and using a preponderance of evidence standard will be essential for the survival of the workers' compensation system in the next decade.
These studies "give us the preponderance of evidence that we need to conclude that cetuximab is a real drug of use in patients with colorectal cancer," said Dr.
The burden would fall on the plaintiff to prove by a preponderance of evidence that the crime was gender motivated and not a random act.
"The preponderance of evidence suggests that deceived participants do not become resentful about having been fooled by researchers and that deception does not negatively influence their perceptions about psychology or their attitudes about science in general," states Allan J.
Therefore, we must move in the direction in which the preponderance of evidence takes us--accrual-basis recognition--and keep working to improve the problem areas.
He explained that a conviction on the criminal charge requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, while a judgment of liability on the civil charge requires only a preponderance of evidence.
The vast preponderance of evidence shows we are to blame, our emissions speeding up the heating process.
Essentially by consensus, consistency of occurrence and preponderance of evidence.
Up until now the standard of evidence was "clear and convincing." This is a step below the "reasonable doubt" standard used in criminal cases, but more stringent than "preponderance of evidence" that is normal for civil matters.
In Gerlach's trial, the defense must prove by a preponderance of evidence that Gerlach's mental state at the time of the crimes either caused him to commit them or prevented him from recognizing their criminality or from conforming his conduct to the law.
The preponderance of evidence favors treating low HDL aggressively Although HDL elevation can be challenging in many patients, any rise in serum HDL decreases the risk for CAD-related complications.