Ownership-specific advantages

Ownership-specific advantages

Property rights or intangible assets, including patents, trademarks, organizational and marketing expertise, production technology, and management and general organizational abilities, that form the basis for a company's advantage over other firms.

Ownership-Specific Advantages

Intangible assets in a company, such as intellectual property, property rights, brand recognition, and other areas. Owning the copyright to a superior product is an example of an ownership-specific advantage, as is an exceptionally good organizational system. Ownership-specific advantages are less quantitative ways a company is able to remain competitive against companies in the same industry. That is, the idea behind ownership-specific advantages states that there is more to competition that simply providing the best price. Intangibles also play a significant role.
References in periodicals archive ?
Ownership-specific advantages could be competitive in nature and firms could enjoy monopoly power, "possession of a bundle of scarce, unique and sustainable resources and capabilities, which essentially reflect the superior technical efficiency of a particular firm relative to those of its competitors" (Dunning 2000a: 168).
According to Dunning's OLI-model, a global allocation of the production depends on the analysis and understanding of three advantages: Ownership-Specific Advantages, Location-Specific Advantages and Internalization-Incentive Advantages (Dunning & Lundan, 2008), thus the title OLI-model.
Ownership-specific advantages are advantages that the company has vis-a-vis companies in the particular markets in which it operates or plans to operate.
* Our analysis of 1,355 Chinese private enterprises shows that their ownership-specific advantages in areas such as corporate governance, inherited advantage from mergers and acquisitions of state-owned companies, and inward internationalization increase the level of outward internationalization.
Their moderating effect on the link between some ownership-specific advantages and venturing is negative, suggesting a substitutive role of experience in interacting with ownership-specific advantages with the process of internationalization.
This is due to the fact that China authorised the establishment of wholly foreign-owned enterprises and promised higher property rights protection on ownership-specific advantages as part of its WTO commitments, allowing MNEs to maximise their returns on these specific advantages and have full control over the business operations, and thus being willing to transfer more advanced technology to China.
According to the traditional theory of multinational corporations (MNCs), foreign-affiliated establishments are expected to have higher productivity than local establishments because MNCs have several ownership-specific advantages, including superior production technology and managerial resources.
In the Chinese context, ownership-specific advantages mainly take the form of specialized knowledge and relationships with the government and customers in the PRC.
According to Dunning, ownership-specific advantages refer to the extent and nature of the technological, managerial, and marketing advantages of international law firms vis-a-vis local law firms in the country in which they are producing or contemplating value-added legal advice.
Ownership-specific Advantages of International Law Firms
In particular, we examine the question whether capital intensity, skill intensity, and economies of scale explain all of the labour productivity differences between foreign and local firms, or whether foreign firms enjoy some ownership-specific advantages, such as proprietary technology and management expertise, etc.
The first is Ownership-specific advantages or firm specific advantages (FSAs), these are advantages which reside at the firm level.