Mutual Assent


Also found in: Legal.

Mutual Assent

In law, the requirement that each party to a contract must agree to the same thing and must know what the other party intends. Mutual assent is necessary for a contract to be legal and enforceable.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
The Court of Appeal said that it was not illogical, implausible, or without support in the record for the district court to have concluded that the facts and law clearly supported a finding of mutual assent.
20(1)(a)): "There is no manifestation of mutual assent to an exchange [no binding contract] if the parties attach materially different meanings to their manifestations and neither party knows or has reason to know the meaning attached by the other..." In other words, if the parties unknowing attach different meanings to a material term of their agreement, no binding contract is formed.
One area that may be especially tricky for a smart contract is showing "mutual assent" to the contract.
(204) At bottom, these agreements are best understood as religiously sanctioned loopholes to avoid religious rules against charging interest, and do not represent the parties' mutual assent to adopt contractual obligations.
(48.) RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS [section][section] 3 (agreement defined), 18 (manifestation of mutual assent) (1979); see also Rodgers v.
A showing of mutual assent is necessary for there to be an enforceable contract.
According to the courts, the Act provides broader relief than that afforded by contract law because it uses the term "employment agreement" rather than "employment contract." One court explained, "[a]n 'agreement' is broader than a contract and requires only a manifestation of mutual assent on the part of two or more persons; parties may enter into an 'agreement' without the formalities and accompanying legal protections of a contract." (20)
In the particular case of expectation damages, the challenge is to see whether there can be such entitlements at the moment of contract formation and therefore fully established solely through the parties' expressions of mutual assent even in the absence of actual reliance.
This case provides that the first step toward mutual assent is an offer by one of the parties and that mutual assent occurs when that offer has been accepted by the other party.
This Essay explores an alternative to one of the pillars of contract law, that obligations arise only when there is "mutual assent"--when the parties reach consensus over the terms of the transaction.

Full browser ?