The Court of Appeal said that it was not illogical, implausible, or without support in the record for the district court to have concluded that the facts and law clearly supported a finding of mutual assent
20(1)(a)): "There is no manifestation of mutual assent
to an exchange [no binding contract] if the parties attach materially different meanings to their manifestations and neither party knows or has reason to know the meaning attached by the other..." In other words, if the parties unknowing attach different meanings to a material term of their agreement, no binding contract is formed.
One area that may be especially tricky for a smart contract is showing "mutual assent
" to the contract.
(204) At bottom, these agreements are best understood as religiously sanctioned loopholes to avoid religious rules against charging interest, and do not represent the parties' mutual assent
to adopt contractual obligations.
(48.) RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS [section][section] 3 (agreement defined), 18 (manifestation of mutual assent
) (1979); see also Rodgers v.
A showing of mutual assent
is necessary for there to be an enforceable contract.
According to the courts, the Act provides broader relief than that afforded by contract law because it uses the term "employment agreement" rather than "employment contract." One court explained, "[a]n 'agreement' is broader than a contract and requires only a manifestation of mutual assent
on the part of two or more persons; parties may enter into an 'agreement' without the formalities and accompanying legal protections of a contract." (20)
an in-depth discussion of mutual assent
in clickwrap, specifically the
In the particular case of expectation damages, the challenge is to see whether there can be such entitlements at the moment of contract formation and therefore fully established solely through the parties' expressions of mutual assent
even in the absence of actual reliance.
The concept of mutual assent
, or a meeting of the minds, is basic to contracting.
This case provides that the first step toward mutual assent
is an offer by one of the parties and that mutual assent
occurs when that offer has been accepted by the other party.
This Essay explores an alternative to one of the pillars of contract law, that obligations arise only when there is "mutual assent
"--when the parties reach consensus over the terms of the transaction.