hostile takeover

(redirected from Hostile Acquisitions)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus.
Related to Hostile Acquisitions: Hostile bid, Takeover Bids

Hostile takeover

A takeover of a company (usually made by an open tender offer to shareholders) against the wishes of the current management and the Board of Directors by an acquiring company or raider.
Copyright © 2012, Campbell R. Harvey. All Rights Reserved.

Hostile Takeover

The acquisition of one company by another without the consent of the target company's board of directors. Generally speaking, a hostile takeover involves the acquiring company buying stock directly from shareholders, sometimes by offering a particularly high price. The acquiring company may buy up to 5% of the target company without registering the move with the SEC. See also: Friendly takeover, Corporate raider.
Farlex Financial Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc. All Rights Reserved

hostile takeover

Wall Street Words: An A to Z Guide to Investment Terms for Today's Investor by David L. Scott. Copyright © 2003 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
(5) Asset Alienation: TRAC has recommended that acquirers be permitted to declare their intention to alienate "material assets" of the target, (233) which may enhance their ability to raise finances for hostile acquisitions. (6) Defensive Measures: Perhaps TRAC's most significant recommendation is its recommendation to explicitly inhibit the target board's ability to pursue defensive tactics.
and Sterlite Industry of Hindalco Industries, Ltd., (11) Kohinoor Foods Ltd.'s fears that a Temptation Foods Ltd.-led consortium was attempting a covert hostile acquisition, (12) the Dalmia Group's interest in Gesco Corp., (13) Jagajit Jaiswal's bid for Jagatjit Industries, Ltd.
It examines two latent hostile acquisition defenses inherent in the structuring of Indian corporations--one based on Press Note 2 (2009) and the other on the size of the investment that the hostile acquirer proposes to make.
With respect to the steps required to consummate a hostile acquisition in India, the Indian regulatory landscape can be understood from two perspectives.
(52) Alternatively, if a general meeting is fast approaching, the hostile acquirer can take this step first, and seek to gain proxy access to set the hostile acquisition in motion.
Moreover, taking into account the historical likelihood of domestic institutional investors ("DII") voting with promoters, if domestic institutional investors stakes are counted with promoter stakes, the study found that fifty-seven companies, representing 28.5% of the sample set, are vulnerable to hostile acquisition. Tables 1 and 2 present the conclusions of the study conducted, identifying those companies from the sample set where the promoter holding was under 50% (Table 2), and companies from the sample set where the combined promoter and domestic institutional investor holding was less than 50% (Table 1).
However, at least three latent defense mechanisms additionally inhibit the hostile acquisition route in India.
When this data is consolidated with tire data in Table l, one finds that a total of 86 of 200 companies, representing 43% of the sample set, are vulnerable to foreign (inbound) hostile acquisition.
Of course, the hostile acquirer can make a hostile acquisition in India despite this provision.
In this manner, nationalist sentiment forms an invisible barrier to the hostile acquisition under the approval route.
2 Indeed, Bhagat, Shleifer, and Vishny |4~ analyze hostile takeovers during the period 1984-1986, and find that white knight acquisitions lead to fewer layoffs (blue collar and white collar) than successful hostile acquisitions or cases in which the target remained independent.