Requirements for an accountable plan
are found in IRS Publication 463, Travel, Entertainment, Gift, and Car Expenses (http://bit.
Rather than reimbursing employees for actual expenses, an accountable plan
can instead pay predetermined mileage or per-diem travel allowances up to the amounts paid to federal employees.
We say we're against it, yet we have no coherent, measurable and accountable plan
to reduce it.
Most employers take advantage of the accountable plan
rules to deduct travel and entertainment expenses.
Amounts paid to an employee under an accountable plan
for tickets to a sporting event must meet several conditions, in addition to the usual accountable plan
requirements, to be deductible as a business expense by the employer.
This program improved outcomes and behaviors: Meetings started and ended on time, had a defined purpose and the right people were in attendance; meetings stayed on topic and participants developed an actionable and accountable plan
for follow up.
If your company has what the IRS calls an accountable plan
, everyone can benefit from the tax treatment.
The court's definition in TLC is inaccurate to the extent in relies on the accountable plan
rules, which cover only employee reimbursement arrangements, in determining the existence of a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement to identify who bears the expense under
This includes wages, employee benefit and deferred compensation plans, employer-provided fringe benefits, reimbursement of payments to employees under an accountable plan
for the employee's business travel expenses, and payments made by the employee to providers of the employee's travel, meals, and lodging when the employee is traveling on government business and is reimbursed under the accountable plan
An accountable plan
is one that requires the employee (a) to adequately account to the employer for expenses and (b) return any excess reimbursement to the employer.
It is not just the terms of your accountable plan
Along with the revenue procedure, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2002-35, which clarifies that payments to employees for equipment they are required to provide as a condition of employment are wages for federal employment tax purposes, unless such payments are paid under an accountable plan