column 1 | column 2 | column 3 |
---|---|---|
tax | tax | tax |
bands | rates | payable |
(£) | (%) | (£) |
0- 5,000 | exempt | nil |
5,001–10,000 | 20 | 1,000 |
10,001–15,000 | 30 | 1,500 |
15,001–20,000 | 40 | 2,000 |
----- | ||
total | ||
4,500 | ||
----- |
The increasing rate of taxation is shown in column 2. The greater the individual's earnings, the greater the rate of tax that is levied.
Virtually all western economies exhibit some form of progressive taxation structure as a means of redistributing income from the more affluent members of society to the poorer (see POVERTY). This type of ABILITY-TO-PAY PRINCIPLE is regarded, as far as earned personal incomes are concerned, as the most equitable form of taxation. Ideally, however, a progressive income tax structure should not only promote social equity by redistributing income, but should also encourage enterprise by avoiding penal rates of taxation at the upper end of the income scale and, together with SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS, provide suitable incentives to work at the lower end of the income scale. Compare REGRESSIVE TAXATION, PROPORTIONAL TAXATION. See also INCIDENCE OF TAXATION, REDISTRIBUTION-OF-INCOME PRINCIPLE OF TAXATION, SUPPLY-SIDE ECONOMICS, LAFFER CURVE, MARGINAL RATE OF TAXATION.