(2) Telser (1987) shows that an empty core may arise from several complex situations in oligopoly, relating mainly to indivisibilities in production and demand.
Some responses that a firm might normally consider are not possible for Network because of indivisibilities in production.
The idea that conflict is due to indivisibilities seems to be well understood in the political science literature concerned with conflict.
(2) Indivisibilities: Indivisibilities may lead to conflict for several reasons.
One example from the financial markets is mutual funds, which relax wealth constraints and asset indivisibilities. (2) (See DeGennaro and Kim 1986.) Other examples are two exchange-traded funds, the American Stock Exchange's Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts, better known as Spiders, and Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock, better known as QQQs.
Asset indivisibilities are an important reason mutual funds and derivative securities such as Spiders and QQQs exist.
One example from the financial markets is DeGennaro and Kim (1986), which shows how mutual funds relax wealth constraints and asset
indivisibilities. Other examples are two exchange-traded funds, the American Stock Exchange's Standard and Poor's Depositary Receipts, better known as Spiders, and Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock, better known as QQQs.
Such
indivisibilities result in dramatically increasing returns to scale: If a $1 million investment in research and development results in just one unit of an invention, the prototype, a $2 million expenditure could result in the prototype plus thousands or millions of duplicates.
infrastructure), and pecuniary and technological externalities in underdeveloped countries and thus the prevalence of market failures in those countries, emphasized a visible rather than the Smithean notion of the invisible hand, the theory of the big push, strategic complementarity, and, as a means of correcting distortions associated with
indivisibilities, externalities and various failures, the programming of investment projects.
However, Scarf has advanced a strong case for reconsideration of the role of
indivisibilities; in particular, because their presence leads to the failure of the pricing test for optimality or for welfare improvements (1994, pp.
But when scale economies and
indivisibilities prevail in construction, as undoubtedly they do for many kinds of development (e.g., hotels, shopping centers, theaters, and commercial office buildings), land development is lumpy and does not proceed continuously.