Unauthorized Practice of Law


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Acronyms, Wikipedia.

Unauthorized Practice of Law

1. The crime in which one poses as one qualified to give legal advice.

2. The act in which one acts as a lawyer (before a court, for example) without permission. Unauthorized practice of law in this sense may not be a crime, but does violate regulations or court rules.
References in periodicals archive ?
Is there, or should there be, an unauthorized practice of law problem?
The principal justification offered for unauthorized practice of law prohibitions is "to protect the public from the consequences of inexpert legal services.
1967); see also Lanctot, supra note 170, at 828-36 (discussing various unauthorized practice of law challenges in the 1970s and beyond).
1944) (Hexter), the Court ruled that an insurance company had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law through the use of staff attorneys.
Grafner argued that Johnson's and the priest's hearing activities, which included examining and cross-examining witnesses, objecting, arguing, and making a closing statement, constituted the unauthorized practice of law.
Some state statutes categorize the unauthorized practice of law as a misdemeanor criminal act.
Stated another way, a claimant must allege as an essential element of any cause of action premised on the unauthorized practice of law that this Court has ruled the activities are the unauthorized practice of law.
When Allstate's claims adjusters engage in the unauthorized practice of law, plaintiff attorneys can knock down the company's defenses with a series of arguments.
But, after an 11-month investigation, the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of the Texas Supreme Court dismissed all charges before the firm even had a chance to fully present its own defense.
Because of this understanding, nonlawyer practitioners believe that if they are practicing estate planning and are not lawyers, they are probably engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.
But the appellants, in their brief, contended that the Fourth DCA ruled correctly when it held, "[n]o case has approved of using the alleged unauthorized practice of law as a sword prior to a determination by the Supreme Court of Florida that the services actually constitute the unauthorized practice of law.