Finder of Fact

(redirected from Fact Finders)
Also found in: Legal.

Finder of Fact

In law, person or group assigned to determine whether and how an event occurred. For example, a finder of fact may be asked whether an accused person in fact robbed a bank. The finder of fact is generally a judge or jury. The finder of fact is also called the trier of fact.
References in periodicals archive ?
As a result, a successful direct of a fact witness is one that makes the fact finder like and respect the witness and gives the fact finder emotional and factual reasons to find in favor of the party who offers the witness.
By putting a human face on the witness and showing where the witness fits into the community and the events in question, the attorney gives the fact finder a basis for believing what the witness says.
If you practice in a jurisdiction where you must sit or question from an immovable podium, moderate your behavior accordingly so that the attention of the fact finder is directed at the witness and not at you during the direct examination.
The acquisition of Fact Finders gives our Investigation and Intelligence Group the opportunity to expand its presence in this important area.
It helps the fact finders remember it throughout detailed testimony and understand the connection with the conclusion.
When it's over, the fact finders should be totally convinced of the reasonableness of the conclusion.
Too much detail may confuse fact finders, while too little will require them to fill in missing parts based on personal experience.
Since this paper is about the implications of epistemological theory for evidence law, the point it makes does not hang upon the psychological ability or inability of fact finders to treat evidence in a certain way.
51) As will become clear, however, this criterion is not enough to cover all of the considerations that need to be addressed when dealing with the justifications for beliefs of fact finders in the courtroom.
Among its other tasks, the law of evidence should be concerned with ensuring that knowledge attributions made by fact finders to witnesses or to themselves are made on the basis of adequate and reproducible justifications.
If you worry about the fact finder losing the chain of events, you can use some looping (i.
That raises the risk the witness will not understand or, worse yet, the fact finder will miss the import of the question and answer.