Kontrol ve hasta grubu arasinda yapilan ANCOVA
analizi sonuclari (N = 237) Kontrol (n = 175) M SS OIO-44 161.
results for third grade examining differences between students in the intervention and control group.
tests with effect sizes were conducted to determine differences among the three clusters with respect to tobacco smoking, alcohol use, and gambling frequency and expenditures, with education and income as covariates.
Because of the different level of teaching experience across the five instructors, ANCOVA
was conducted, using the pretest as the covariate, to examine whether instructor type (senior faculty, junior faculty, adjunct faculty) was related to attitudes toward research.
A 2 x 2 ANCOVA
was performed on this phase of the repeated measures; it indicated significant differences within groups ([F.
results for questions representing the participatory citizen and the justice-oriented citizen were not statistically significant.
the slopes are different, so comparisons of intercepts would be meaningless), we compared metabolic rates between the sexes using a separate ANCOVA
for each species with log mass as the covariate and sex as a factor.
05) and the ANCOVA
results suggest that this difference is attributable to the target fairness ratings (see Tables 2 and 3).
found that there was an overall significance of family cohesion scores among model programs after controlling for the baseline family cohesion scores, age, and education [F (6, 782) = 45.
A statistically significant increase in course grade was revealed and ANCOVA
results showed that the increase was associated with student GPA, faculty and type of course.
To test the potential suppressing effects of neuroticism, a corresponding ANCOVA
was conducted, adding neuroticism as a covariate.
A repeated measures ANCOVA
with controlling for individual differences is utilized to analyze a sample data from 21 social science graduate students at a Midwest university.